Got to agree,,,
Here’s the irony for me. The Alliance Defense Fund argues often and
loudly that Christian symbols on public property — nativity scenes, Ten
Commandments monuments, etc — do not constitute endorsement of the
explicitly religious message they
convey. But in an image that has only the most distant relationship with
any religious belief at all, they suddenly see a required endorsement
of a religious message. Funny, that.
Wingnut Loses Weird Religious Freedom Suit | Dispatches from the Culture Wars
Welcome to H&C,,, where I aggregate news of interest. Primary topics include abuse with "the church", LGBTQI+ issues, cults - including anti-vaxxers, and the Dominionist and Theocratic movements. Also of concern is the anti-science movement with interest in those that promote garbage like homeopathy, chiropractic and the like. I am an atheist and anti-theist who believes religious mythos must be die and a strong supporter of SOCAS.
Thursday, May 24, 2012
Wingnut Loses Weird Religious Freedom Suit | Dispatches from the Culture Wars
Labels:
News,
Religion,
Social Issues
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment