In Welch v. Brown, (ED CA, Nov. 5, 2014), a California federal district rejected Free Exercise and Establishment Clause challenges to California's ban on mental health professionals providing "sexual orientation change efforts" (SOCE) for minors. The decision follows on the 9th Circuit's rejection of a free speech challenge to the law. At issue was a claim by a licensed therapist who was also an ordained minister. The court held that the SOCE ban is a neutral law of general applicability, so that only rational basis review need be applied, saying:Religion Clause: 9th Circuit, With Dissents, Denies En Banc Review In Reparative Therapy Ban Challenge
Welcome to H&C,,, where I aggregate news of interest. Primary topics include abuse with "the church", LGBTQI+ issues, cults - including anti-vaxxers, and the Dominionist and Theocratic movements. Also of concern is the anti-science movement with interest in those that promote garbage like homeopathy, chiropractic and the like. I am an atheist and anti-theist who believes religious mythos must be die and a strong supporter of SOCAS.
Sunday, November 30, 2014
Religion Clause: 9th Circuit, With Dissents, Denies En Banc Review In Reparative Therapy Ban Challenge
The continuing saga of California's SB 1172.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment