As assumed
in a previous posting concerning HB2,,,
Abortion is back before the Supreme Court, and the
justices could signal by the end of June whether they are likely to
take up the biggest case on the hot-button subject in nearly a
quarter-century.
If the court steps in, the hearing and the eventual ruling would come amid the 2016 presidential campaign.
The
court is considering an emergency appeal from abortion providers in
Texas, who want the justices to block two provisions of a state law that
already has forced the closure of roughly half the licensed abortion
clinics in the state. Ten of the remaining 19 clinics will have to shut
their doors by July 1, without an order from the Supreme Court.
The
Texas law is among a wave of state measures in recent years that have
placed restrictions on when in a pregnancy abortions may be performed,
imposed limits on abortions using drugs instead of surgery and increased
standards for clinics and the doctors who work in them.
The
Texas case involves the last of these categories. The provisions at
issue require clinics to meet hospital-like surgical standards and also
call on doctors who work in the clinics to have admitting privileges at a
nearby hospital. Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry signed
the law in 2013 when he was the state’s governor.
[,,,]
The case could be attractive to the justices
because it might allow them to give more definition to the key phrase
from their last big abortion ruling, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, in
1992. States generally can regulate abortion unless doing so places “an
undue burden” on a woman’s right to get an abortion.
Court to rule on Texas abortion law which closed clinics across state
No comments:
Post a Comment