Thursday, May 19, 2016

UPDATED::Should Chicago priest return to ministry after revelations of teen misconduct? - Chicago Tribune

UPDATE::  Thanks to reader Basketball Jones, we have this bit of recent information, IL--Admitted predator priest will not be put back to work in Chicago, courtesy of SNAP.
Fr. Bruce Wellems admits having repeatedly sexually abused Eric Johnson when Wellems was 15 and Johnson was seven. The Chicago Archdiocese temporarily suspended Fr. Wellems but dragged their feet for months while pondering whether to let the priest work again in Chicago again.

When confronted about his abusive acts, Fr. Wellems attacked the messenger, saying reports of his abusive acts had “no factual basis.”

In a bizarre twist, when our group warned parents and parishioners about Fr. Wellems, he attacked us, saying we’re guilty of “poor judgment” and “victimizing the thousands of families in the parishes where I have worked.”

Now, Archbishop Blasé Cupich should hold a news conference, explain his irresponsible and secretive behavior with this admitted predator and announce this decision to keep Fr. Wellems out of ministry in Chicago.
UPDATE::A different side to the controversy as Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP) is none too happy.
Fr. Wellems’ backers try to spin this as a story of sin and redemption. That’s disingenuous at best and downright dangerous at worst. This is a story of crime, not sin, and of recklessness, not redemption.

In a bizarre twist, when our group warned California parents and parishioners about Fr. Wellems, he attacked us, saying we’re guilty of “poor judgment” and “victimizing the thousands of families in the parishes where I have worked.”

Catholic officials in at least two states have long kept Catholic families in the dark about Fr. Wellems’ past. If they truly feel he is not a risk to re-offend, why won’t the honor their pledges to be “transparent” and be open and public about Fr. Wellems’ admitted crimes? Why won’t they be honest with parents and let them make their own decisions about whether to trust Fr. Wellems around their kids.

Instead, church officials kept quiet about his past and put children at risk.

The Archdiocese of Los Angeles is not much better. Although they did remove Fr. Wellems, they posted no public announcement and duped parishioners about the scope and scale of Fr. Wellems’ crimes.

IL--Admitted predator priest is still on the job; Victims respond
See also::  IL--End the silence 
__
My first question would be "define" teenager?  Second, has there been any hint of misconduct in the intervening years?  And third, is he in the priesthood for the right reasons?  Even then, "'How can you make a mistake that causes so much pain to one person, live with it and go on?' Schultz said through tears. 'He found a way to do it.'"

But there is an interesting aspect to this piece as a whole, "Minors often don't sexually offend again, as opposed to adult sex offenders, for whom recidivism rates are greater"  If that holds true, is - as the article asks- zero tolerance open for interpretation?
Should a priest's sexual misconduct as a youth bar him from ministry? That's the question facing Chicago Archbishop Blase Cupich.

For decades, the Rev. Bruce Wellems, a Roman Catholic priest with the Claretian Missionaries, has served as a father figure for young men in Chicago's Back of the Yards neighborhood.

But when revelations of his sexual misconduct as a teenager resurfaced in 2014 shortly after his religious order transferred him to California, Los Angeles Archbishop Jose Gomez removed him from ministry immediately. He returned to his former neighborhood to resume work as a youth advocate and community organizer.

Now Cupich must decide whether the popular priest can wear a collar, celebrate Mass and officially return to active ministry. Wellems, 58, admits to the abuse, though his recollection of the details and how long it lasted differs from the victim's.
,,,
Ten years later, Johnson came across Wellems' name again in Chicago Parent magazine. He contacted Schultz, the former Sun-Times reporter who by then had become the magazine's editor and Wellems' friend.

She said she and others couldn't find any allegations of abuse by Wellems as an adult. Still, she confronted Wellems, who admitted to his inappropriate conduct as a teenager. But during that uneasy conversation, Schultz said she could tell that Wellems was ashamed by what he had done and had devoted his life to making up for it.

"How can you make a mistake that causes so much pain to one person, live with it and go on?" Schultz said through tears. "He found a way to do it."

The fact that no other complaints exist now doesn't matter, Johnson said. It can take years for a child who has been sexually abused to come forward, he said.
Should Chicago priest return to ministry after revelations of teen misconduct? - Chicago Tribune

7 comments:

  1. http://www.snapnetwork.org/il_admitted_predator_priest_will_not_be_put_back_to_work_in_chicago

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah most excellent, TY very much for the update as I have taken a step back from posting such stories.

      Delete
    2. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-chicago-priest-barred-from-ministry-met-20160525-story.html

      Delete
    3. Thank you again Basketball Jones :)

      Delete
  2. Johnson was puppet for snap!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you any evidence showing this statement to be correct? If there is a counter argument I should include please provide the URL and I would be happy to post it alongside or as an addendum to this article.

      Delete
  3. http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6637ed5e5f59448b9bc88f41fdda7fe2/chicago-based-religious-order-sued-docs-allegations

    ReplyDelete