Showing posts with label Marcellus Shale. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marcellus Shale. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Says It’s Unconstitutional For Gas Companies to Frack Wherever They Want | Alternet

Some major parts of Pennsylvania’s two-year-old Marcellus Shale drilling law are unconstitutional, the state’s Supreme Court decided Thursday.

As the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports, the court voted 4 – 2 that a provision that allowing natural gas companies to drill anywhere, regardless of local zoning laws, was unconstitutional. Seven municipalities had challenged the shale drilling law, known as Act 13, that required “drilling, waste pits and pipelines be allowed in every zoning district, including residential districts, as long as certain buffers are observed.”

WTF!! a “physician gag order”

,,,challenges by Pennsylvania citizens and townships on provisions in the law that prohibit doctors from telling patients about health impacts related to fracking chemicals were sent back to Commonwealth Court for reevaluation. The “physician gag order” (or “ frack gag“) was recently challenged by a doctor who claimed it infringed on his First Amendment rights and his duties as a doctor, but his challenge was thrown out by a Pennsylvania court in October,,,
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Says It’s Unconstitutional For Gas Companies to Frack Wherever They Want | Alternet

See also:

The Basics about Pennsylvania’s Act 13
Gags physicians treating patients exposed to chemicals that are claimed as a trade secret or confidential proprietary information by prohibiting health professionals from disclosing the information provided to the professional by a vendor, service provider or operator. Further, a written statement of need and a confidentiality agreement is to be provided by the health professional “as soon as circumstances permit. (p. 3)

Pennsylvania Act 13 - Pa. HB1950
Another area of serious contention regards the restrictions placed on Pennsylvania health care professionals. It violates some of the basic tenets Pennsylvania doctors are sworn to uphold regarding public health. Pennsylvania doctors have been 'gagged' by the legislation when it comes to sharing critical information, as pointed out in this legal opinion:

“Health professionals who are authorized to share Secret Information are likely to be responsible for ensuring that all persons receiving the information understand that it may not be communicated to anyone (except, perhaps, regulatory officials) not involved in the patient’s diagnosis and treatment. In a medical emergency, the health professional thus must ensure that a patient receiving life-saving Secret Information understands that the information may not be disclosed to others who may be at risk, including family members. If the Secret Information is released by persons who learned it from a health professional, and the health professional cannot prove that he or she exercised reasonable care to prevent those persons from divulging the information, the professional could be liable for damages resulting from the disclosure.”

Excerpt from May 2012 opinion by EarthJustice


Thursday, September 12, 2013

Charged With Illegally Dumping Polluted Fracking Fluid, Exxon Claims 'No Lasting Environmental Impact' | ThinkProgress

",,,[S]hould a small release occur,,,” Last I looked 57,000 gallons of crappy water is not small as they had to remove 3,000 tons of contaminated soil; and what do they mean by "no lasting environmental impact," how exactly is that defined? Whether it be due to negligence or vandalism XTO is responsible for what occurs on their work site. The sites around where I live run 24/7 so the vandalism claim doesn't make sense, though it is feasible. I just can't see any Joe Smoe walking on site and tampering with their stuff.  Then again maybe I could, ",,,[t]he site had no fence, no guards, and surveillance cameras or other security measures." But the vandalism explanation loses face by XTO's own admission when they changed their story ",,,it appears an individual working for the independent contractor managing the site moved water from the affected tank to other tanks on site and did not close the valve,,,"

Also an issue ",,,but XTO continued to use the tanks for storage of waste water without any surrounding impoundment to catch a spill or a leak,,,these back valves usually were fitted with a four-inch threaded plug, which would be installed and removed with a wrench and which would act as a safeguard against accidental opening of a valve,,,[t]he valves could be locked, but none at the XTO site were, according to the presentment."

I think what troubles me in regards to fracking as a whole is the unknowns. (Which for me is many, I will admit I do not understand the whole process and what conceivable benefits there are to this method.) What, if anything, is it doing to our planet? And WTH is in that fracking fluid: ",,,states have allowed minimum disclosure of the chemicals used in fracking fluid,,," According to one article I read, ",,,high levels of strontium, chloride, bromide, barium, and total dissolved solids,,," is what was found in regards to this incident.

As a transplanted flatlander who has come to enjoy what mother nature offers here in PA, I find the lack of concern and pandering to big oil by politicians troubling. This is not a red or blue issue Rendell opened the door and Corbett followed suit, we the people are going to pay the price.

Charged With Illegally Dumping Polluted Fracking Fluid, Exxon Claims 'No Lasting Environmental Impact' | ThinkProgress

See also:

Attorney general files criminal charges against Marcellus gas drilling company

Company facing criminal charges for spill of Marcellus drilling waste blames it on vandalism or negligence of contractor

EPA Requires XTO Energy to pay $20 Million; Fines XTO $100,000 for 2010 Spill