Wednesday, March 4, 2020

Once again Jillian is intentionally misrepresenting science

Paper in question Antifungal effects of Lactobacillus species isolated from local dairy products (2017)

From the abstract, This paper aims to examine the isolation of Lactobacillus from local dairies as well as to determine their inhibition effect against a number of pathogens, such as two fungi: Penicillium notatum and Aspergillus fulvous.”

Results:
Having separated eight Lactobacillus isolates, about 70% of the isolates have shown the inhabiting areas of antifungus on the agar-based setting, but two species Lactobacillus alimentarius and Lactobacillus delbrueckii have indicated a significant antifungal effect against P. notatum and A. fulvous.


The use of biological methods to eliminate and reduce fungal toxin is highly regarded. One of these methods is to use LAB such as lactobacilli are effective Studies have shown that LAB in the fermentation process to produce bacteriocin-like compounds and organic acids can inhibit the growth of mold and thereby preventing aflatoxin B1 production.

Notice it states nothing about combating an internal yeast over growth (ie candida).

In the current study of Lactobacillus probiotic dairy different locations in the city of Ahvaz, such as yogurt, milk, cheese, and continued isolation and identification of antifungal effects were observed. 

So once again Jillian's own source does not state what she claims. This study was interested in protecting food stuffs using a process such as fermentation. It found that 2 specific LABs were effective against 2 specific fungi.

Jillian also fails in providing evidence that her slop contains the two species of lactobacillus noted in the paper/

,,,two species Lactobacillus alimentarius and Lactobacillus delbrueckii have indicated a significant antifungal effect against P. notatum and A. fulvous,

Once again Jillian is intentionally misrepresenting science showing her true nature – scam as many people as possible.

No comments:

Post a Comment