Some Indiana legislators simply haven’t learned their lesson. Last year, we raised our voices – alongside prominent Hoosiers, Indiana businesses, and key national institutions like the NCAA – to amend a harmful Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) bill that sanctioned discrimination in the name of religious freedom.Stop S.B. 66 | American Civil Liberties Union
Now Indiana is trying to pass a “Super RFRA,” S.B. 66 – an even worse law. And if it passes, it could set off a wave of similar laws enacted across the country.
This is not what religious freedom is supposed to do in this country.
The “Super RFRA” undermines critical protections against discrimination. If this bill becomes law, people would be allowed to use religious beliefs as an excuse to harm others. A landlord could claim their religion requires them to deny housing to an unmarried mother. Or a business owner may refuse service to a same-sex couple, citing freedom of religion.
Welcome to H&C,,, where I aggregate news of interest. Primary topics include abuse with "the church", LGBTQI+ issues, cults - including anti-vaxxers, and the Dominionist and Theocratic movements. Also of concern is the anti-science movement with interest in those that promote garbage like homeopathy, chiropractic and the like. I am an atheist and anti-theist who believes religious mythos must be die and a strong supporter of SOCAS.
Showing posts with label Mike Pence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mike Pence. Show all posts
Monday, February 1, 2016
Stop S.B. 66 | American Civil Liberties Union
Please sign the enclosed "Act Now" petition!!
Wednesday, October 21, 2015
Lines being drawn for Indiana’s next fight over LGBT rights – LGBTQ Nation
Months after a divisive religious objections law thrust Indiana
into an unwanted national spotlight, gay rights supporters and
religious conservatives are preparing for another potentially bitter
debate — this time over enshrining LGBT protections into state law.
Republican Gov. Mike Pence and key leaders in the GOP-controlled Legislature have gone to lengths to avoid publicly discussing the matter, even as Democrats plan to push legislation and several Indiana cities have considered adopting their own lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender protections. At the same time, religious conservatives are using a new tactic: raising concerns that children will be exposed to transgender people and what they say are sexual predators in public restrooms if the protections are approved.
No one with a stake in the issue — including a gay-rights coalition that includes many of Indiana‘s prominent businesses — says there’s much room for compromise. That sets the stage for what “could be a huge mess” when the Legislature convenes in January, said Paul Helmke, a public affairs professor at Indiana University and former Republican mayor of Fort Wayne. It also could have a lasting impact on Pence’s re-election bid next year.
Lines being drawn for Indiana’s next fight over LGBT rights
Republican Gov. Mike Pence and key leaders in the GOP-controlled Legislature have gone to lengths to avoid publicly discussing the matter, even as Democrats plan to push legislation and several Indiana cities have considered adopting their own lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender protections. At the same time, religious conservatives are using a new tactic: raising concerns that children will be exposed to transgender people and what they say are sexual predators in public restrooms if the protections are approved.
No one with a stake in the issue — including a gay-rights coalition that includes many of Indiana‘s prominent businesses — says there’s much room for compromise. That sets the stage for what “could be a huge mess” when the Legislature convenes in January, said Paul Helmke, a public affairs professor at Indiana University and former Republican mayor of Fort Wayne. It also could have a lasting impact on Pence’s re-election bid next year.
Lines being drawn for Indiana’s next fight over LGBT rights
Friday, July 10, 2015
Bring Back Needle-Exchange Funding - Pacific Standard
It
was something of a shock when Indiana Governor Mike Pence declared a
public health emergency last March—Scott County, in the southern part of
the state near the Kentucky border, isn't the kind of place that comes
to mind when you think of drug abuse and HIV outbreaks. But by that
March, 79 people in the county had tested positive for HIV, a consequence of rampant intravenous drug use in southern Indiana. But it didn't have to be that way, according to a new perspective published today in the New England Journal of Medicine.
The real culprits, the authors argue, are counterproductive drug
policies such as Indiana's ban on needle-exchange programs, and the
overuse of prescription painkillers.
"Many observers were surprised" by Pence's declaration, according to authors Steffanie Strathdee and Chris Beyrer. "Other
observers, however, had seen it coming." A growing number of people in
Scott County, as well as neighboring counties and states, had been using
drugs such as the painkiller oxymorphone. But as new policies made
those drugs harder to acquire, addicts increasingly turned to
alternative injectable drugs, including heroin. And
because Indiana makes it hard to get clean needles—using a needle for
non-medical purposes is a felony punishable by up to three years in
prison—more and more people had to either share or go without a fix.
This
was a recipe for disaster when it came to HIV and other blood-borne
viruses, like hepatitis C. By June 10th of this year, 169 people had
tested positive for HIV in southeast Indiana, where Scott County is
located, compared with the typical five per year. Eighty percent of
those with HIV also tested positive for the hepatitis C virus.
All
of this points to the need for an overhaul of some of Indiana's—and the
nation's—drug policies, Strathdee and Beyrer argue. First,
needle-exchange programs should be the norm. While Pence's order lifted
the effective ban on such programs, the reprieve is temporary and only
applies to counties undergoing declared public health emergencies, "a
requirement that ensures they can only respond to, rather than prevent,
new outbreaks." the authors write. That goes for other
states—needle-exchange programs are effectively illegal in 24 other
states—as well as the federal government. Congress should permanently
lift the federal ban prohibiting funding to needle-exchange programs,
Strathdee and Beyrer argue.
Bring Back Needle-Exchange Funding - Pacific Standard
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)