So just how bad is Jillian Epperly at understanding science and how it functions? As the following examples will show, really bad. Some may say, it cant be that bad,,, may I present this:
Initially I was going to present all examples from a two-week(ish) span where Jillian went bonkers posting Google search results as proof her notions were correct. I then realized how many memes I actually produced; I grabbed just 10 instead.
A word of caution, I am a lay person. Interpretation of papers Jillian presented as evidence or proof, are my own.
Out of any this first one from April 4, is my favorite (post has been deleted):
Also deleted, from June 18:
Hmmm, this post is also deleted (June 18),
Also deleted from June 18,
I'm beginning to see a trend here Jillian. So when a critic counters your information, instead of responding or correcting your information, you just delete it? Pretending you never presented such information - that's not how science works honey. Science learns from its mistakes or gaps in knowledge.
Oh look another June 18th entry deleted,,, surprise surprise!
No luck with this entry either,
Oh oh,,, I found one you didnt delete from June 20,
While not a study/paper, I find the inclusion of the following article a bit odd considering your stance against holistic medicine.
And one last one for good measure, also from June 18,
I think I have made my point! You Jillian have no understanding of how science works. Before your information leads one to harm,,, STOP!!
Welcome to H&C,,, where I aggregate news of interest. Primary topics include abuse with "the church", LGBTQI+ issues, cults - including anti-vaxxers, and the Dominionist and Theocratic movements. Also of concern is the anti-science movement with interest in those that promote garbage like homeopathy, chiropractic and the like. I am an atheist and anti-theist who believes religious mythos must be die and a strong supporter of SOCAS.
No comments:
Post a Comment