Salt
is salt, a point I have belabored many times on this blog in regards
to Jillian. No matter the sources it is NaCl. Whether
there are trace minerals present, it matters not. The concentration is too low to be of any consequence to the human body.
Fluid
retention/edema is often caused by the increase of blood pressure on
the veins which adds to the pressure on the capillaries. The
irregular changes in the blood vessels are often associated with
eating habits.
Higher
amounts of sodium greatly contributes to water retention.
Fluid
retention/edema is often caused by the increase of blood pressure on
the veins which adds to the pressure on the capillaries. The
irregular changes in the blood vessels are often associated with
eating habits.
Higher
amounts of sodium greatly contributes to water retention.
Water
retention can also be the result
of a medical condition as well as issue surrounding menstruation.
Why it is important to seek medical attention if edema last more that
a few days.
While
there are many recommendation in regards to food or drink to intake,
the number one recommendation is to reduce sodium.
The guidelines recommend no more than 6g of total salt a day as an adult. However, people with CV or renal diseases have to have a reduced salt intake due to the fact it will kill them.
Taking in little to no salt also has its own risks with regards to function muscle activity and body water regulation.
In all fairness by eating a normal diet, it’s highly unlikely you would ever become salt deprived unless suffering from excessive sweating and dehydration.
Now this is where Jillian contradicts herself. Water and salt share a very special relationship, where salt goes, water follows. By taking in huge quantities of salt, your doing 2 very bad things:
1) you’re over working your renal system and slowly but certainly killing off your kidneys. While in the short term, you will not see any changes in values. It is important to note that you will only show signs of kidney failure once you are down to about 20% total function. That’s a loss of 180% Kidney function (remember we have 2 kidneys and only total of 20% function or below would show signs of failure).
2) you’re causing serious dehydration with regards to plasma levels, total water levels and in turn reducing the functions of your body’s metabolic activity. Most of our reactions that take place in the body will do so in the presents of water. Where water is lacking the body will take it from over sources including muscles (including the heart if required), your blood, bones (that should manifest at the start as a headache), your digestive system including faeces and the skin where is a certain amount of water stored.
So while she can post all these “articles” and claim she knows all there is to know about disease and good health, The peer reviewed and uncountable amount evidence proves otherwise.
I
want you to think about this post real hard. This is the level
of stupid we are dealing with and why anything this woman states
should be ignored.
The
over consumption of salt is not about context. It is not about
intent. Nor is it about outcome or “specific measureable results. “
Plain and simple salt can kill. It is not a matter of belief, the
over consumption of salt as prescribed in Jillian's protocol, will do
damage.
As
I stated prior, salt is salt. The chemical make-up is NaCl. Context
doesn't matter. If you surpass safe limits, you're going to have
issue and lactobacillus ain't gonna help you. Dose does make the
poison!
First, there is no such thing as “synthetic iodine.” At least not in the manner Jillian is alluding to. While iodine is one of the least available stable halogen elements, it can be extracted and purified for human use, if that makes it synthetic so be it; just like salt, whether PHS, CSS, or table salt.
First, there is no such thing as “synthetic iodine.” At least not in the manner Jillian is alluding to. While iodine is one of the least available stable halogen elements, it can be extracted and purified for human use, if that makes it synthetic so be it; just like salt, whether PHS, CSS, or table salt.
Second
iodine poisoning is very rare unless you do what Jillian states she
did. She over consumed an iodine supplement. The
adult recommendation
is
“150 µg (microgram)
for adults, 220 µg for pregnant women and 290 µg for
lactation. The Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) for adults is
1,100 μg/day. This upper limit was assessed by analyzing the
effect of supplementation on thyroid-stimulating
hormone.
IOWs, unless you have a diagnosed iodine deficiency, taking a supplement is unnecessary. Taking any supplement without medical advise is unnecessary Jillian admittedly poisoned herself.
Iodized
salt in the U.S. contains 45
micrograms
of iodine per gram of salt. The recommended daily intake for adults
is 150 micrograms, which can be obtained from about one-half
to three-quarters of a teaspoon
of table salt. Testing of the general population indicates that most
Americans consume sufficient levels of iodine
through their diets.
Why
do I note this, Jillian
equates
salt poisoning to iodine poisoning based on a list of symptoms.
And
FYI, there are no sub-categories of salt. Consuming over 2300 mgs of
salt puts one at risk no matter what is also consumed – ie
lactobacillus. Jillian's slop is not special, where salt goes so
does water. As my bio-med friend stated, "Most
of our reactions that take place in the body will do so in the
presents of water. Where water is lacking the body will take it from
over sources including muscles,,,.”
A
few days later, she
doubles down adding this.
Now
I have read The
Salt Fix.
No where does it state anything about “synthetic
salt or just straight sea salt.”
What DiNicolantonio proposes is a diet consisting of up to 6000mgs
of salt. That is equivalent to less
than
one, 2c recipe/batch of JJ.
And
BTW,
DiNicolantonio's
work is a non peer reviewed book.
And while the caveat from above may vindicate in some regards, the
science is still, 3 years later, hotly contested in some circles. It
in no way supports Jillian's 47,344 mgs of salt per day.
Ignoring the con-nut BS, I will repeat a question asked in regards to MMS. If salt kills the nasties - worms and fungus - how does the salt determine our cells from the nasties? We are composed of the same or similar material.
Jillian,
while commenting in the subsequent thread, notes how children pour
salt on slugs. What she doesn't note, salt kills slugs by
dehydration. The
process of osmosis is the same process that will occur in our bodies;
our cells.
It's
called the “dead sea” for a reason. The Dead Sea is the deepest
hypersaline
lake in
the world. With a salinity
9
times as salty
as the ocean. The salinity
makes for a harsh environment in which plants and animals cannot
flourish. Several microorganism,
bacteria and microscopic algae live in the Dead Sea. These
microorganisms can survive there because they are well adapted to
hyper-salinity conditions.
Last
I looked, I am not a microorganism,
bacteria or microscopic algae. Soaking in the Dead Sea is in no way
analgous to consuming her swamp water.
Again,
also
baffled by this. Does she not read what she writes? The alleged
health benefits of the Dead Sea are external.
Can
someone please explain exactly how PHS or CSS communicate with
lactobacillus? Or the electrolytes?
A
salt water flush, plain and simple, is the consumption of 1 tsp salt
disolved in 1 quart water. Drink then poop. It's a laxative. The
only difference, JJ contains 6X the amount of salt, added fiber, and
maybe lactobacillus. It is a salt water flush “plus.”
Drinking
salt water on an empty stomach may cause nausea and vomiting. You may
experience cramping, bloating, and dehydration. Colon cleansing in
general may cause an electrolyte imbalance due to the rapid loss of
sodium and fluids.
Jillian
passes these signs/symptoms as being so-called “healing symptoms.“
No, this is what a salt water flush can do to an individual.
Healing symptoms, they are not.
How
is purging, boosting the immune system? “Boosting” your immune
system is called auto-immunity. Not a pleasant condition to have.
Again
how are the components of JJ communicating? What bio-mechanisms are
being used to facilitate this communication?
Jillian
keeps referring to a brick and motar business model. The body doesn't
work in that
manner.
More
questions than answers.
So,,,
of
the 500,000+ studies concerning salt, not one supports your
contention of consuming the amount of salt you suggest.
Whether
it be 2 cups, 1 quart, or 1 gallon.
As
I say in my challenge, show me one study that states the daily
consumption of more than 6000 mgs of salt is safe.
She
can't because there are none! Scientific consensus rules the day no
matter what one believes.
For
once I
partially agree with Jillian PHS is safe,,, in moderation.
The
trace minerals are just that trace. The
concentration are low enough that there is no effect on the body.
No,
table salt is not poisonous or a carcinogen, when consumed properly. As noted above,
there is no such thing as synthetic iodine. As
for the additives in iodized table salt::
Iodized
salt has been
used since 1924 and consists of table salt mixed with a minute amount
of potassium iodide, sodium iodide or sodium iodate. A small amount
of dextrose may also be added to stabilize the iodine.
Sodium
ferrocyanide is
sometimes added to salt as an anticaking agent. The additive is
considered safe for human consumption. Such anticaking agents have
been added since at least 1911 when magnesium carbonate was first
added to salt to make it flow more freely.
Sodium
hexacyanoferrate,,,
was last evaluated by the Committee on the Toxicity of Chemicals in
Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (COT) as an anti-caking
agent in salt in 1988. The COT confirmed that sodium hexacyanoferrate
was provisionally acceptable for use in food,,,
Other
anticaking agents sometimes used
include tricalcium phosphate, calcium or magnesium carbonates, fatty
acid salts (acid salts), magnesium oxide, silicon dioxide, calcium
silicate, sodium aluminosilicate and calcium aluminosilicate.
In
developing nations,
there is what is called "doubly fortified salt". Both
iodide and iron salts are added. The iodine for prevention of goiter,
the iron for prevention of Neural Tube Defects (NTD), for example
spina bifida.
Over
in the UK, parts of
Europe and Mid/South America, fluoride salts are added to table salt with the goal of reducing tooth
decay.
As
per usual with woo-meisters, the use of safe chemistry, that is
highly regulated, is questioned. The use of untested, non peer
reviewed bullshit must be accepted at all cost as to safety and
efficacy.
While
not specifically salt related, the following will give an idea of
what we are up against.
Basically
what
Jillian implies is all academic and scholarly material is wrong
because she has anecdotal testimany from followers that confirm her
bias.
While
every dx's has a starting point for diagnosis and treatment, that is
where similiarities end. The medication I take for my diabetes is
completely different from, let's say, my friend AJ.
We are
both type two diabetics. We were diagnosed 10-12 yrs apart. Mine
later in life, I was 37, AJ was dx'd in her late 20s.
My
diabetes is controlled through diet, exercise, and oral medication.
AJ is insuliin dependent.
While I am overweight, AJ is
morbidly obese. We are not the same/ Yes, we have the same disease
but our etiologies are different. Our treatments are different.
And, our prognoses are different.
Jillian
is obviously not familiar with the concept of prior
plausibility, “the
plausibility of a result, given everything else we know about the
universe.
In other words, when evaluating a hypothesis or a study, you should
weight your confidence in the result not only on the characteristics
of the study in question, but also on how
likely it is that a given result is true given our prior knowledge."
Simply put, I can ignore Jillian's statements concerning salt (and reversing various conditions) based solely upon knowledge we already have.
As I noted prior, Jillian has no concensus science demonstrating the consumption of salt she suggests is safe. JJ relies solely on self-reported testimonials, while using her slop, which include the results of traditional care received. There is no previous knowledge base to place expectations on. The minions assign the positive effects of standard treatment to their use of JJ.
Simply put, I can ignore Jillian's statements concerning salt (and reversing various conditions) based solely upon knowledge we already have.
As I noted prior, Jillian has no concensus science demonstrating the consumption of salt she suggests is safe. JJ relies solely on self-reported testimonials, while using her slop, which include the results of traditional care received. There is no previous knowledge base to place expectations on. The minions assign the positive effects of standard treatment to their use of JJ.
WTF
does main-stream media have to do with any of this?
The
only concept Jillian touts is drink her slop.Research?? I
don't think she knows what that means. And yes I have read all the
files. Jillian has nothing to support any of her claims. Zilch,
zero, nada.
I don't look to mainstream media for answers
regarding medical information,,, it gets worse!
Up next in part 3, the remainder of 2017!!
No comments:
Post a Comment