Mayor Bill de Blasio, a Democrat, signed an
executive order on Monday that guarantees people access to single-sex
facilities consistent with their gender identity at city facilities,
including offices, pools and recreation centers, without the need to
show identification or any other proof of gender. The move comes amid a
continuing national debate over anti-discrimination laws.
“Access
to bathrooms and other single-sex facilities is a fundamental human
right that should not be restricted or denied to any individual,” de
Blasio said. “Every New Yorker should feel safe in our city — and this
starts with our city’s buildings.”
,,,
The order does not apply to New York City’s public schools because there
already is a policy that students must be allowed to use locker rooms
or restrooms consistent with their gender identity. A bill currently
pending before the city council would require publicly available,
single-occupancy restrooms in both public and private buildings to be
designated as gender-neutral.
Bill de Blasio signs order allowing transgender access to NYC bathrooms – LGBTQ Nation
UPDATE:: South Dakota governor vetoes law on transgender bathrooms__
South Dakota‘s governor vetoed a bill Tuesday that would have made the state the first in the U.S. to approve a law requiring transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms that match their sex at birth.Republican Gov. Dennis Daugaard, who initially reacted positively to the proposal but said he needed to research the issue, rejected the bill after the American Civil Liberties Union and the Human Rights Campaign insisted it was discriminatory.In his veto message, Daugaard said the bill “does not address any pressing issue” and that such decisions were best left to local school officials. He also noted that signing the bill could create costly liability issues for schools and the state. The ACLU had promised to encourage legal action if the bill became law.
,,,
Daugaard initially offered a positive reaction to South Dakota‘s proposal, but said he wanted to listen to testimony before making a decision. Last week, he met with three transgender individuals and heard their personal stories; before the meeting, the governor said he had never knowingly met a transgender person.
Opponents said the legislation an attack on vulnerable transgender students that would further marginalize them at school. They also criticized comments made by some lawmakers, including Republican Sen. David Omdahl.“I’m sorry if you’re so twisted you don’t know who you are,” Omdahl said when asked about the bill last month.
“I’m telling you right now, it’s about protecting the kids, and I don’t even understand where our society is these days.”
Proponents of the legislation say it would help protect children and ensure everyone’s privacy, but its passage has inserted South Dakota into the center of a national debate about transgender rights and access to restrooms and locker rooms.