Forensic Proof that Obama's Wife is a Man - YouTube

This piece is not a coherent as I would like but then again the topic itself is out there,,,

A few months back, this offensive collection of words and pictures came over my feed; don't ask how or why, it just did.  I watched it, wished I never did and forgot all about it until the other day. (Seriously you don't need to watch it, it's that bad.)





So, my ring finger is longer than my index finger, does that mean I'm really a man?  I compared my hands to a couple of the guys at work, and guess what, they're all female,,,

The 2D:4D ratio was a popular topic in the early 1900s, written about by George Ruggles in "Human finger types" (1930).  Research though has come a long way since then and it  has been found that this "phenomenon" is due to fetal exposure to androgens around the 13th week of pregnancy.  What the video fails in doing, noting that the sex difference in 2D:4D is present before birth in humans.  Bare in mind that these findings are "controversial" in the sense that the finding do not always hold true.

So much for the finger ratio, they conclude, although the study authors leave open the possibility that prenatal hormonal effects may still affect finger lengths:

Our data are compatible with evidence from patient studies showing that (finger size ratio) can be influenced by androgens during gestation, but call into question the widespread assumption that small differences in the size of the ratio are an accurate gauge of relative differences across individuals in fetal testosterone exposure, including the exposure of the brain.

So do we need Michelle's birth-certificate as well to "prove" she was born female?

That fact that this video is using anthropometric methods is reminiscent of an era long gone. Does the Bureau for Enlightenment on Population Policy and Racial Welfare ring a bell? What about Craniometric Certification?  If I chose to go full con-nutter, I would interpret this vile video as a means to re-introduce the racial hygiene concept of Arthur de Gobineau who "argued that race created culture, and that 'impure' 'race-mixing' leads to chaos." 

__

"And it seems to me perfectly in the cards that there will be within the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing ⦠a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda, brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods." (Aldous Huxley)

So why am I babbling about racial hygiene and eugenics concepts?  Maybe because "it was Alex Jones" (said in my best Church Lady voice).



First lJoan Rivers now Alex Jones, "something mysterious and monstrous" about Michelle Obama.  I'm not sure which is worse Rivers for creating "controversy" to sell her new book or Jones who admits that he has always wondered for years, citing a recent video (see above) he had watched as motivation to go where Rivers went.

"Well, Joan Rivers talked about it the other day, and now it’s an international news story.  The question is, ‘Who is Michelle Obama? Is she really a woman? Is she a man?’”  Hence the video above as it appears that Jones is citing directly from the material presented.

Now normally I pay no heed to Alex Jones and his various internet endeavors (InfoWars and/or Prison Planet), but certain topics yes - Jones has an odd fascination with eugenics, genetic mutations, transhumanism and population control.  So when two of his recent episodes came out I ignored them.  Then a third video popped, a "special report" came out and since I didn't have to sit through possibly a whole show, I listened.


Besides the obvious outrage many of us should feel, I on the other hand focused in on the unusual - go figure.

Jones claimed that the only women he’s ever seen with such wide shoulders suffer from a “chromosomal disorder” caused “by all this toxic waste and GMO that’s been introduced." 

• “For me, this really isn’t just a laughing matter. It’s not just the sexuality, but the very genetics of the human species across the board is being manipulated.”  
• ",,,to reduce population and break up the family.”
• "The truth we're dealing with, a move towards eugenics and dehumanization period; that makes Brave New World look like an instruction manual,,,Huxley did say in his non-fiction book Brave New World Revisited (1961) that indeed it was an instruction manual.  And his brother headed up the UN plan at UNESCO to actually end the sexes as we know it and create biological androids to serve the State."
• ",,,designer babies,,,"  (http://www.infowars.com/ivf-designer-babies-and-three-parent-babies-raise-serious-ethical-questions)
• ",,,the globalists are a cult of genetic engineering."

Now here is what I found interesting, take a listen to this 2011 video:



‘Ancient Alien Nephilim, Giants, Mutants, Genetic Engineering, and Hybrids’ from Chuck Missler.  Sound a bit familiar doesn't it?

We have (perceived) genetic manipulation creating a "mysterious and monstrous" individual,

"Is there genetic manipulation in the Bible? Yes! In fact, you will not understand most of the Old Testament unless you really understand who the Rephaim really were… This is coming on our society as the Bible anticipated it…. Has this happened before? Yes!"

According to Missler, the Giants (Nephilim/Rephaim) are hybrids, the offspring of divine fathers (fallen angels according to some) and human mothers. Missler is not merely saying that the threatening world of medical and genetic breakthroughs is metaphorically creating new forces of danger and chaos, his concerns go deeper than that. Missler believes that genetic science will literally bring back the Giants to earth, or in the words of Jones, "create biological androids to serve the State."

So in essence, a sinister agenda,

"This was Satan’s strategy, to corrupt the human race, to prevent a Messiah… Why did God tell Joshua to wipe out every man, woman and child of certain tribes? Because they had a gene-pool problem. One of the things which brought about the Flood of Noah was a gene-pool problem."

Basically what Missler does to captivate and impress his audience, he blends into his "sermons" bizarre and extreme views on science and physics in preparation for a propaganda blitz.   Very similar to what Jones does

Now I not stating that there is a connection between Jones and Missler, or that one promotes the others work..I just find the comparison both interesting and bizarre.  Just something that has been nagging at me,,,

Forensic Proof that Obama's Wife is a Man - YouTube