I have been sitting on this for a few days. Pondering. Can an individual, a prominent one at that, be so,,,so, stupid?
Back in the day, I listened to Dobson on a daily basis. I won't go so far as to say I idolized the man but he ranked quite high. (Please don't ask,,,roflmao,,,it musta been a delusional state I was in.) The politics weren't as obvious in those days as the Reich we know today was just in its infancy; I was able to brush his anti-gay stance off as our walks in faith were different. But now, I am at a loss,,,can Dobson really be that stupid?
Here is a man, a psychologist who has made a portion of his living "educating" people about homosexuality and
bisexuality. One would think he would actually know what the term bisexual means.
"I would like them to think, just for a moment, about 'LGBT,'" Dobson
said. "The 'B' stand for bisexual! That's orgies! Are you really going
to support this?"
Michael Stone over at Progressive Secular Humanist makes an interesting point along the same vane of thought I had:
It is difficult to believe that a man who claims to have a Ph.D. in
psychology does not know the meaning of words like “bisexual” and
“orgy.”
Indeed, it may be the case that rather than being
ignorant, Dobson was simply being dishonest when equating bisexuality
with orgies in a despicable attempt to smear ad denigrate individuals
who identify as bisexual, and by extension, the LGBT community as a
whole.
It should also go without saying that there is nothing morally
objectionable to consenting adults engaging in “orgies” or sex parties
or group sex or polyamory. What is morally objectionable is the
dissemination of false and misleading information in the attempt to
defame and shame individuals.
To which
Libby Anne of at Love, Joy, Feminism adds:
Evangelicals’ understanding of LGBTQ individuals is less about
reality and more about crafting an image that fits within their
worldview. In evangelical parlance, homosexuality, orgies, and
pedophilia—these things all naturally go together. This is
why evangelicals believe that gay people are naturally promiscuous and
that transgender individuals are likely to abuse children in public
restrooms. This image they have crafted of LGBTQ individuals may not
resemble the reality, but it does allow them to fit the issue snugly
into their belief system.
As more people have openly gay
individuals in their lives, evangelicals are increasingly faced with a
choice. They must either deny the lived experience of the (often few)
LGBTQ individuals in their lives, or they must reject the image they
have been given of LGBTQ individuals by their pastors or other
evangelical leaders as false. If they do the latter, they have to find a
way to adjust their belief system to account for this new understanding
of LGBTQ individuals. And there are evangelicals today who are doing
this, though I don’t have percentages. The past of least resistance,
however, is to simply deny, deny, deny, and hold tight to the
unquestioned belief system, and that is what most seem to be doing, at
least for the moment. It’s certainly what Dobson is doing, though I’m
unsure whether he knows any LGBTQ individuals.
The problem here
isn’t just religion, though it certainly is that when it comes to LGBTQ
issues specifically. When we look more broadly, it’s ideology in general
that is the problem. Any time people set out to fit the world around
them into a specific preconceived ideology, without a willingness to
also look critically at that ideology, they will end up twisting pieces
to fit them into their preexisting puzzle. Religion may be the most
obvious example of this, but there are others, too. Think of communists
or libertarians, for instance. Any time an individuals proclaims an
ideology supreme, they run the risk of finding themselves twisting
pieces to fit them into it rather than being willing to adjust the
ideology when things don’t fit.
So is Dobson really that stupid? I don't think so!!
James Dobson Does Not Understand Bisexuality: 'That's Orgies!' | Right Wing Watch